Different holdings are not enough. Seek different drivers.
Alternative strategies are meant to earn returns for reasons other than the rise or fall of public stock and bond markets. The distinction is not the ticker—it is what actually drives the outcome.
Diversify the source of return.
Owning many public-market funds can still leave a household exposed to the same underlying forces. This lever looks for strategies whose results depend on something else. Some remain reasonably accessible. Others require a long commitment and are available only to eligible investors.
Separate flexibility from patience.
Alternative investments are not one category with one liquidity profile. The framework divides them into liquid and illiquid strategies because the household’s ability to get money back matters as much as the hoped-for return.
Keep reasonable access
Liquid alternatives seek return sources beyond traditional markets while preserving the ability to exit on reasonable notice.
Commit patient capital
Private or tax-advantaged strategies may require years of lockup. Any potential illiquidity premium must survive fees and uncertainty.
Give up access and simplicity
Higher fees, limited transparency, leverage, uncertain valuations, no ready secondary market, and possible loss of principal are real risks.
Illiquid means the money may not be there when you ask for it.
A ten-year commitment is not a savings account with a better return. If the household needs the money in year three, wanting it does not create a market or cancel the lockup.
That is why the illiquid sleeve is sized against actual cash needs. If liquidity is tight, the illiquid sleeve may be capped or eliminated. If a household does not meet a restricted strategy's eligibility requirements, that strategy is excluded regardless of preference.
What this lever is not
- It is not automatically safer than public markets.
- It does not guarantee low correlation in every market environment.
- It is not appropriate for money that may be needed midstream.
- Restricted investments are not available to every household.
Patient capital must truly be patient.
A household has a pool of money it expects to use for a home purchase in three years and another pool intended for the next generation decades from now. Only the long-horizon pool is even a candidate for a multi-year lockup—and suitability still depends on risk, cost, eligibility, and the strategy itself.
Protect near-term access first
Cash needs, emergencies, and planned purchases remain outside long lockups.
Confirm legal eligibility
Accredited-investor or qualified-purchaser standards determine whether some strategies can be considered at all.
Evaluate net—not headline—return
Any possible premium must be weighed after fees, taxes, risk, leverage, and the cost of giving up access.
Can this money wait?
Expected spending and emergency needs set the boundary before strategy selection begins.
Some investments are legally restricted to accredited investors or qualified purchasers.
Complex structures can carry higher expenses, limited reporting, and valuation uncertainty.
The team examines the actual source of return—not merely the asset’s label.
Know what must stay available.
Measure the household’s liquidity, eligibility, time horizon, and total risk before considering a private or alternative strategy.
Schedule COMPASS Vision™